- Followed — T (Abduction: Protective Measures: Agreement to Return), Re 2023-12-01
“…preme Court decisions of Re D (A Child)(Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2006] UKHL 51; [2007] 1 AC 619 (“Re D”), and Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 AC 144 (“Re E”). I have further considered (and make reference below to) the following useful guidance which addresses many of the issues in play her…”
- Cited — Re C (A Child) (Child Abduction: Parent’s refusal to return with child) 2021-08-10
“…In Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144, the Supreme Court described the structured approach to be adopted by a court when evaluating issues relating to Art 13(b):…”
- Cited — A (Child Abduction: Article 13b) 2021-03-09
“…The Judge directed himself accurately in relation to the legal framework, addressing the Supreme Court decisions in Re E (Children: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144 and Re S (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] UKSC 10, [2012] 2 FLR 442, and a number of other prominent decisions, including Re C …”
- Explained — G (A Child : Child Abduction) 2020-09-15
“…f the individual child, was explained by Baroness Hale and Lord Wilson JJSC when giving the judgment of the court in Re E (Children)(Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 AC 144 (“Re E”):…”
- Cited — C (Children) (Abduction: Article 13 (B)) 2018-12-20
“…In E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144 Lady…”
- Cited — S (Abduction: Hague Convention Or BIIa) 2018-05-25
“…rd the interests of parents and children (see: for example, commentary on the Convention by the Supreme Court in In re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 AC 144, paras 14–18). Article 20, useful though it is in appropriate cases, contains no guidance as to the circumstances in which the court will act,…”