- Cited — Jazztel Plc v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-02-25
“… need to be disapplied, or subjected to a conforming interpretation, in order to secure compliance with EU law: see R (Hurst) v London Northern District Coroner[2007] UKHL 13, [2007] 2 AC 189, at [52] and Imperial Chemical Industries plc v Colmer (No 2)[1999] 1 WLR 2035 (HL). Furthermore, say HMRC, this reasoning is consistent with …”
- Approved — Packham, R (on the application of) v High Speed Two (Hs2) Ltd 2020-07-31
“…ion 10(3), in that case it was (see the speech of Lord Brown of Eatonunder-Heywood in R. (on the application of Hurst)v HM Coroner for Northern District London [2007] UKHL 13, at paragraphs 57 to 59, citing the two relevant passages in the judgment of Cooke J. in CREEDNZ, at p.183, which were approved in the speech of Lord Scarman i…”
- Cited — Plan B Earth v Secretary of State for Transport 2020-02-27
“… v Governor-General [1981] N.Z.L.R. 172; [In re Findlay [1985] A.C. 318, at p.334]; [R. (on the application of Hurst) v HM Coroner for Northern District London [2007] UKHL 13; [2007] A.C. 189, at paragraph 57]). The established principle is that the decisionmaker’s judgment in such circumstances can only be challenged on the grounds…”