- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…ho is “within the legislative grasp, or intendment” of the relevant statutory provision, citing Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No. 4) [2008] UKHL 43, [2010] 1 AC 90 at [10]. This phrase originated with Lord Wilberforce in Clark v Oceanic Contractors Inc [1983] 2 AC 130 at page 152C and has often been cited …”
- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…The issue in Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No. 4) [2008] UKHL 43, [2010] 1 AC 90 was whether an order could be made under CPR 71.2 for the examination of an officer of a judgment debtor company who was resident and domiciled…”
- Cited — Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey 2019-06-21
“…The particular drafting of these provisions gave rise to difficulties, as exposed by the decision of the House of Lords in London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, [2008] AC 1399,…”
- Cited — Owen v AMEC Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd & Anor 2019-05-14
“…ceedings. As is well known, section 15 was enacted by Parliament in response to the decision of the House of Lords in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43; [2008] AC 1399. Section 15…”
- Cited — City of York Council v Grosset 2018-05-15
“…law in section 5 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 which had eventually been adopted by the House of Lords in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43; [2008] 1 AC 1399. The House of Lords reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal in that case ([2007] EWCA Civ 763; [2008] Ch 119), which had been to the eff…”
- Followed — City of York Council v Grosset 2018-05-15
“…rovided protection from disability-related discrimination but, following the judgment of the House of Lords in the case of London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, those provisions no longer provided the degree of protection from disability-related discrimination that is intended for disabled people. This section is aime…”
- Cited — Green v Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd & Anor 2018-04-20
“…tutory defence to a claim by a landlord for possession if the tenant can show that the claim is discriminatory so as to be unlawful: see Lewisham LBC v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43; [2008] 1 AC 1399. Although Lord Bingham said at paragraph 19 of his judgment, that such a defence would not be “made out very often”, Lady Hale, at paragraph …”