- Cited — Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications PLC 2023-04-26
“…The law on contractual interpretation was definitively established by the trio of Supreme Court cases on the subject, namely Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173.…”
- Cited — Al Mana Lifestyle Trading LLC & Ors v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Ors 2023-01-31
“…As Lord Clarke JSC said in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR at [21]:…”
- Cited — Abdulrahman Bin Abdullah bin Ibrahim Al-Subaihi & Anor. v Mishal Maan Al-Sanea 2022-10-20
“… well-known legal principles of contractual construction are non-contentious and to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900 (“Rainy Sky”); Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC…”
- Cited — Robert Nicholas Jason Scholfield & Anor. v Matthew David Smith & Anor. 2022-06-21
“…ch Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896 (“ICS”), Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 AC 1101 (“Chartbrook”), Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] AC 1173 (“Wood”). It can be…”
- Cited — Soteria Insurance Limited (formerly CIS General Insurance Limited) v IBM United Kingdom Limited 2022-04-04
“…The principles of contract construction have been set out in no less than three recent Supreme Court cases: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 at [14]-[30]; Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 at [14]-[22]; and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Limited [2017] UKSC 24 at [8]-[15]. They are well-known and it…”
- Cited — Steve Ward Services (UK) Limited v Davies & Davies Associates Limited 2022-02-14
“…[2011] UKSC 50 at [14] –[30];…”
- Cited — ABN Amro Bank N.V. v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc & Ors. 2021-12-02
“…[2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 W.L.R 2900 (…”
- Cited — European Film Bonds A/S & Ors v Lotus Holdings LLC & Ors 2021-05-28
“…The Judge, having referred to Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, Arnold v Britton [2015 UKSC 361 at [15] and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, summarised the relevant principles of contractual constructio…”
- Cited — Fishbourne Developments Ltd v Stephens 2020-12-16
“…C at [14] – [23] and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Limited[2017] AC 1173:[2017] UKSC 24per Lord Hodge JSC at [8] – [15] and Rainy SkySA & Ors v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 per Lord Clarke at [21].…”
- Cited — Abc Electrification Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd 2020-12-04
“…The well-known general principles of contractual construction are to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173.…”
- Cited — Apache North Sea Ltd v Euroil Exploration Ltd & Anor 2020-10-30
“…The well-known principles of contractual construction are to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173. No issu…”
- Cited — Primus International Holding Company & Ors v Triumph Controls - UK Ltd & Anor 2020-09-22
“…ation. It is agreed that those principles can be found in the copious recent guidance emanating from the Supreme Court, represented by Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC…”
- Cited — Barings (UK) Ltd v Deutsche Trustee Company Ltd & Ors (Rev 1) 2020-04-09
“…erpretation were correctly summarised by the Chancellor at [28]-[32] of his judgment, and were based on the principal cases, namely Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1WLR 2900, Re Sigma Finance Corp…”
- Cited — Liddle & Ors v Liddle & Ors 2019-03-07
“…ey are clear and unambiguous. It requires no reading of words into the contract. He prays in aid the decisions of the Supreme Court in Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 at [23] per Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony and Arnold v Britton [2015] AC 1619 at [17][20] per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury.…”
- Applied — Harcus Sinclair LLP v Harcus Sinclair UK Lte 2019-03-05
“…hat he put to one side questions of restraint of trade. He took the principles to be applied from the Supreme Court’s decisions in Rainy Sky SA v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, Arnold v. Britton [2015] UKSC 36, and Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Limited [2017] UKSC 24. The judge held that the words “the contemplated Group…”
- Cited — PM Law Ltd v Motorplus Ltd 2018-07-26
“…rcial about construing the 2007 Agreement in a way which did not oblige Motorplus to refer a quantity of claims: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900; [2011] UKSC 50 per Lord Clarke at [41].…”
- Applied — Trillium (Prime) Property GP Ltd v Elmfield Road Ltd 2018-07-04
“…he application of paragraph 3 to the rent review process. Where the language of a contract is unambiguous, the court must apply it: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900 at [23].…”
- Applied — Nesbit Law Group LLP v Acasta European Insurance Company Ltd 2018-02-21
“…rd to the litigation funding scheme as a whole. The judge took the legal principles he was applying to the construction issue from Rainy Sky SA v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (“Rainy Sky”) and Re Sigma Finance Corporation [2010] 1 All ER 571, including the principle that where there are two possible constructions the court was entit…”