- Considered — Simawi v London Borough of Haringey 2019-10-31
“…ce a retrospective justification: R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 1293, [2006] 1 WLR 3213 at [129]; Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] ICR 716 at [59] and [76]. However, in the case of a retrospective justification, the court will not have had the benefit of the considered decision of …”
- Considered — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…e an ex post facto justification: R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 1293, [2006] 1 WLR 3213 at [129]; Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes [2012] UKSC 16, [2012] ICR 716 at [59] and [76]. However, in the case of an ex post facto justification, the court will not have had the benefit of the considered decision of…”
- Cited — The Lord Chancellor & Anor v McCloud & Ors 2018-12-20
“…tiny in assessing both legitimacy of aims and proportionality of means. He said, however, (para 134) that the Supreme Court in Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] ICR 716 had reconciled these two approaches by:-…”
- Cited — The Lord Chancellor & Anor v McCloud & Ors 2018-12-20
“…between the domestic and the European authorities. The parties agreed, however, that the most significant authority was that of Seldon vClarkson Wright & Jakes [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] ICR 716 in the Supreme Court which, although a case about a compulsory retirement age contained in a solicitors’ partnership, contains a comprehensive …”