- Cited — The Motherhood Plan (R on the application of) v HM Treasury 2021-11-24
“…[2017] UKSC 27, [2017] ICR 640,…”
- Cited — Heskett v Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) 2020-11-11
“…It will be seen that both the ET and the EAT referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] ICR 640. That case concerned what Lady Hale, with whom the other members of the Court agreed, called “a system in transition”. At para. 47 of her judgm…”
- Considered — Delve & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions 2020-09-15
“…governing this area of the law were reviewed by Baroness Hale DPSC in Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency), Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343 (‘Essop’). The first claim considered in that appeal concerned black and minority ethnic civil servants over the age of 35 who challenged th…”
- Cited — McNeil & Ors v Revenue And Customs 2019-07-03
“…gments of Lady Hale in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Homer[2012] UKSC 15, [2012] ICR 704, (esp. at para. 14 (pp. 709-710)) and Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343: in the latter she emphasises the “salient features” common to all the various iterations of the indirect discrimination concept (see paras.…”
- Cited — Owen v AMEC Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd & Anor 2019-05-14
“…In the judgment in Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27; [2017] ICR 640 Baroness Hale said, at para. 17:…”
- Cited — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…A provision, criterion or practice is usually described as a “PCP”. As Lady Hale put it in Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343 at [25]:…”
- Cited — The Lord Chancellor & Anor v McCloud & Ors 2018-12-20
“…udgment about the mass of evidence which there was before the tribunal for that of the employment judge. Moreover, as Lady Hale observed in Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27; [2017] ICR 640, para 47, we must be able to detect an error of law. The quotations we have, at some length, made from the judgment of the employment tribunal …”
- Considered — The Lord Chancellor & Anor v McCloud & Ors 2018-12-20
“… the decision in Essop, and whilst it affirmed the decision in Naeem, it did so on different grounds: Essop v Home Office; Naeem v Secretary of State forJustice[2017] UKSC 27; [2017] ICR 640. We consider this judgment in some detail below. Suffice it to say that Sir Alan held that in his view the decision of Lady Hale established th…”