- Cited — The Good Law Project, R (on the application of) v The Prime Minister & Ors 2022-12-01
“…[2012] UKSC 44, […”
- Cited — The Queen (on the application of Rights: Community: Action) v The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government 2021-12-20
“…. (on the application of Buckinghamshire County Council) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3; [2014] 1 W.L.R. 324, and Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44; [2013] PTSR 51 – both decisions of the Supreme Court.…”
- Cited — Hudson, R (On the Application Of) v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead & Ors 2021-04-26
“…The starting point for any consideration of this issue is the judgment of Lord Carnwath in Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44; [2013] PTSR 51 where he said:…”
- Cited — Gathercole v Suffolk County Council 2020-09-09
“…In relation to the that test, he relied on two decisions of the Supreme Court. In Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51, Lord Carnwath was dealing with an appeal about a major road scheme in Scotland for which permission had been granted. He referred to similar a…”
- Followed — Gathercole v Suffolk County Council 2020-09-09
“…e grant of permission, it is necessary to consider the consequences in terms of any remedy. Following the decision of this court in Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51, it is clear that, even where a breach of the EIA Regulations is established, the court retains a discretion to refuse relief if the applicant …”
- Cited — Plan B Earth v Secretary of State for Transport 2020-02-27
“…This view seems consistent with both domestic and European authority. In Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44; [2013] P.T.S.R. 51, Lord Reed (in paragraphs 10 to 30 of his judgment), in the light of European case law including Terre Wallonne ASBL v Region Wallonne (Joi…”
- Cited — Goring-On-Thames Parish Council, R (on the application of) v South Oxfordshire District Council & Anor 2018-04-25
“… realistic possibility of the district council’s decision being different but for the error of law (see Lord Carnwath’s judgment in Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, at paragraphs 111 and 112, his judgment in R. (on the application of Champion) v North Norfolk District Council [2015] UKSC 52, at paragraphs 54 to 66, and th…”
- Cited — Lancashire County Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs & Anor 2018-04-12
“…y to give reasons was consistent with the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Aarhus Convention (see Lord Carnwath’s judgment in Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, at paragraph 100). Though planning law is a creature of statute, Lord Carnwath stressed that “the proper interpretation of the statute is underpinned by gener…”