- Cited — Qasim Ali Raza v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-01-18
“…In paragraph 106, the FtT directed itself, by reference to Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690, that the best interests of the children were a primary but not the paramount consideration. No other consideration was intrinsically more s…”
- Cited — L3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-10-21
“…The appellant in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690 was a failed asylum seeker from the Republic of Congo. He had married another failed asylum seeker from the Congo. They had three children t…”
- Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“…f the Child. The point was reiterated when the relevant principles were summarised by the Supreme Court in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2014] 1 WLR 3690 (also known as FZ (Congo)) [10]. In Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam), [2014] EMLR 7 [22], Sir James Munby, P (as he had by then become)…”
- Cited — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…ases, including ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166, Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2013] 1 WLR 3690 and R (MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for Home Affairs [2017] UKSC 10, [2017] 1 WLR 771.…”
- Followed — HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2020-09-04
“…4, [2011] 2 AC 166; H (H) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic [2012] UKSC 25, [2013] 1 AC 338; and Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2013] 1 WLR 3690. At para. 10 of his judgment in Zoumbas Lord Hodge summarised the position in seven propositions, as follows:…”
- Cited — HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2020-09-04
“…st not be blamed for matters for which he or she is not responsible, such as the conduct of a parent’ (see Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2013] 1 WLR 3690, para 10 per Lord Hodge).”…”
- Explained — The London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown (Rev 3) 2020-01-21
“…As the Supreme Court explained in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74 at [10], the best interests of a child are an integral part of the proportionality assessment under Article 8 the Convention.…”
- Applied — CI (Nigeria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-11-22
“…st not be blamed for matters for which he or she is not responsible, such as the conduct of a parent”: see Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690, para 10; and KO (Nigeria), para 15. A corollary of this principle, as it seems to me, is that it would be wrong in applying article 8 to tr…”
- Followed — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…epartment [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166 and subsequent cases, were summarised as follows by Lord Hodge in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690, at para 10:…”
- Cited — SC (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-12-11
“…As is made clear by the Supreme Court decision in Zoumbas v SSHD [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690, whilst the best interests of children is a primary consideration and should be addressed in an orderly fashion, that does not mean or requi…”
- Cited — DA & Orss, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2018-03-15
“…a decision must necessarily be one which is in the best interests of the children. As Lord Hodge put it in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690 para.10:…”