- Cited — Jaskeerat Singh Gulshan v The Lord Chancellor 2023-03-22
“…dvance what such exceptional circumstances may be: as Lord Sumption observes at para. 11 of his judgment in R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] 1 AC 1065, it is unnecessary “to codify the answers to every possible issue which may arise”.…”
- Cited — Harry Miller (R on the application of) v The College of Policing 2021-12-20
“… of crime. There is, moreover, a comprehensive legal framework that regulates the retention of that data: see R(Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis[2015] UKSC 9 at para. 7; Catt v UK app. No. 43514/15 at para. 34. The police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 (the DPA 2018) with regard to the processing of per…”
- Cited — Bridges, R (On the Application Of) v South Wales Police 2020-08-11
“…Having cited the general principles summarised by Lord Sumption in R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] AC 1065 at [11] to [14] and R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another (also known as In re Gallagher) [2019] UKSC 3, [2020] AC 185, at [16] to…”
- Cited — QSA & Ors, R. (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor 2020-02-10
“…he Claimants’ are 100 years old. The Claimants’ challenge should have been directed at the NPCC, as occurred in R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] UKSC 9.…”
- Cited — Butt, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-08
“…ext of police photographs of an individual’s activity in a public place: R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] AC 1065, and Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131. Although the Supreme Court judgments in those two cases set out the relevant principles, Catt was …”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor 2018-06-15
“…If necessary to go further, then my approach is guided by evolving legal policy in this area. In R (Catt) v ACPO [2015] UKSC 9; [2015] AC 1065, Lord Sumption JSC furnished, with respect, an illuminating thumbnail sketch of the development of the law’s protection of privacy:…”