- Cited — The Open Rights Group & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor (Rev1) 2021-05-26
“…ples were articulated by this court in Benkharbouche v Embassy of Sudan [2015] EWCA Civ 33, [2016] QB 347 [69-85]. Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] QB 1003 shows this process at work in the context of data protection.…”
- Cited — Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors 2021-02-01
“…[2016] QB 1003…”
- Cited — The Racing Partnership Ltd & Ors v Sports Information Services Ltd 2020-10-09
“… confidentiality is distinct from privacy. This is reinforced by the subsequent decision of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] QB 1003 that breach of confidence and misuse of private information are two separate and distinct causes of action which rest on different legal foundations and protec…”
- Cited — Bridges, R (On the Application Of) v South Wales Police 2020-08-11
“… it is only those persons that SWP can identify by name. Having referred to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] QB 1003, and to the decision of the CJEU in Case C-212/13 Rynes v Urad [2015] 1 WLR 2607, the Divisional Court concluded (at [122]) that the processing of the Appellan…”
- Cited — WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants 2018-10-22
“…liance and the potential exposure of even small entities to claims for compensation for distress (as recognised in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] QB 1003) by large numbers of victims (as in the present case), all of which might have a chilling effect on enterprise and efficiency. The DPA imposes no express liabi…”
- Cited — Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2018-07-30
“…erable where distress alone is suffered, that is to say where the data subject does not also incur pecuniary loss: Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] QB 1003.…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor 2018-06-15
“…ntified”, directly by way of limb (a) of the definition, or indirectly, by way of limb (b) of the definition: see, Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311; [2016] QB 1003, at [108]. As is to be expected given the statutory background, this approach reflects Art. 2(a) of the Directive. Further and in that regard, para. (26) of th…”