How many times has [2016] UKSC 2 been cited?

[2016] UKSC 2 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] UKSC 2

· cited by 4 · influence score 17/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2016] UKSC 2

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Considered · 1

Considered — CHF & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Newick Church of England Primary School & Anor 2021-04-28
“…Transparency of party identity was considered by Lady Hale in R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2 at [36]:…”
Cited — CHF & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Newick Church of England Primary School & Anor 2021-04-28
“…[2016] UKSC 26; [2016] 1 AC 1081. Here, the degree to which the Appellants‘ names were in…”
Cited — XXX v Camden London Borough Council 2020-11-11
“…of time has not undermined the importance of open justice: “The principle of open justice is one of the most precious in our law”, see R(C) v Justice Secretary [2016] UKSC 2; [2016] 1 WLR 44.…”
Cited — PW v Chelsea And Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust& Ors (Rev 1) 2018-05-11
“…d always anonymity, although either or both may be relaxed.” Per Baroness Hale in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice (Media Lawyers Association intervening) [2016] UKSC 2 para 26. See also the lucid explanation of the rationale for not identifying P in COP proceedings given by Lord Judge LCJ in Independent News Media v. A [2010]…”