How many times has [2016] UKSC 28 been cited?

[2016] UKSC 28 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] UKSC 28

· cited by 3 · influence score 16/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2016] UKSC 28

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — Jarvis v Evans & Anor 2020-07-07
“…Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale summarised the upshot in these terms in McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28, [2017] AC 273 at paragraph 26:…”
Cited — Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery 2020-02-12
“…320/00), [2004] EMLR 379 para. 104; Powell and Rayner v United Kingdom [1990] Application no. 9310/81, [1990] 12 EHRR 355, para 44; and cf. McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28, [2016] 3 WLR 45, [40]-[41]. As mentioned earlier, common law principles of confidentiality and misuse of private information, and statutory intervention, such…”
Considered — Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd 2019-04-16
“…eir presence in the property for that short period “was tolerated”: see paragraphs 144/145. The judge noted the point of law established in McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28, [2017] AC 273, that where a landlord is seeking an order for possession against a private sector tenant, Article 8 does not require the court to consider the …”