- Cited — Anan Kasei Co Limited & Anor v Neo Chemicals & Oxides (Europe) Limited & Ors 2023-01-17
“…In Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors [2017] UKSC 21, [2018] AC 21 Lord Sumption, with whom the other members of the Supreme Court agreed, said at [20]:…”
- Cited — Assetco Plc v Grant Thornton UK LLP 2020-08-28
“…GT submits that the proper approach to these questions is set out in the Supreme Court’s decision in Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors [2017] UKSC 21, [2018] AC 599 (Hughes-Holland) and this court’s decision in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2019] EWCA Civ 40, [2019] 1 WLR 4610 (MBS).…”
- Cited — Chudley & Ors v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) 2019-03-06
“…[53] of Lord Sumption JSC’s judgment in BPE v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21; [2018] AC 599. The normal questions of proof remained: had the appellants shown that, but for the bank’s breach, the loss claimed would not have been suffered…”
- Cited — Khan v Meadows 2019-02-15
“…In Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors and Another [2017] UKSC 21 Lord Sumption endorsed the approach of Lord Hoffman and at [34] observed that the decision in SAAMCO has often been misunderstood, a misunderstanding which ari…”
- Cited — Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP 2019-01-30
“…ical accounting treatment. In particular, in reliance on the SAAMCO line of authority recently reviewed by the Supreme Court in Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors [2017] UKSC 21 [2107] 2 WLR 1029, it contends that this is an “advice” case with the consequence that GT is liable for all the foreseeable consequences of MBS entering into t…”
- Cited — Khan v MNX 2018-11-23
“…In Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors and Another [2017] UKSC 21 Lord Sumption endorsed the approach of Lord Hoffman and at [34] observed that the decision in SAAMCO has often been misunderstood, a misunderstanding which ari…”
- Applied — Lloyds Bank Plc v McBains Cooper Consulting Ltd 2018-03-15
“… Australia Asset Management Corporation v York Montague [1997] AC 191 (“SAAMCO”), as followed and applied in Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors [2017] 2 WLR 1020; [2017] UKSC 21, the scope of its duty was to provide the correct information and it should only be liable for the consequences of the information being wrong;…”