- Cited — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…re is a substantial connection with the proposed development itself (see Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Ltd. [2017] UKSC 60; [2017] PTSR 1413, at paragraphs 29, 30, 47, 48 and 61 to 63). I can see the force of that point. In principle, however, I do not accept that the level of “con…”
- Cited — WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants 2018-10-22
“…Turning to the principles of vicarious liability, the Judge referred to a large number of further authorities: Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60; [2018] AC 355, Bazley v Curry (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 45, Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2002] A.C. 215, Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141, Century Insurance Co Ltd v No…”
- Cited — Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants 2018-07-17
“…s to the facts of the case. Since the decision, that approach had been confirmed by the decision of the Supreme Court in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60, which post-dated the judgment below in this case.…”
- Cited — Kafagi v JBW Group Ltd 2018-05-18
“…The third case to which I must make reference is the decision of the Supreme Court in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60; [2017] 3 WLR 1000. In that case the claimant, as a child, was abused physically and sexually by foster parents with whom she had been placed while in the care…”