- Explained — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“… exception to the usual rule on clauses precluding oral modification, as explained by Lord Sumption in Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd [2018] UKSC 24 at [16].…”
- Cited — UK Learning Academy Ltd v Secretary of State for Education 2020-03-11
“… MCV had been agreed but also, given the terms of clause 30.2 and the decision of the Supreme Court in MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24, [2019] AC 119, that the respondent (or the LSC) was estopped from relying on the requirement for any variation to be in writing signed by the parties.…”
- Cited — Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) 2020-01-20
“…[2018] UKSC 24; [2019] AC 119. The judge quoted [16] of the judgment of Lord Sumption JSC:…”
- Cited — NHS Commissioning Board (Known As NHS England) v Vasant (t/a MK Vasant & Associates) & Ors 2019-07-16
“…rinciple enforce a contractual provision which regulates the way in which the contract can be validly amended: MWB Business Exchange Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24, [2019] AC 119. Lord Sumption said at [11]:…”
- Cited — Simantob v Shavleyan 2019-06-28
“…1] 1 QB 1 (CA); In Re Selectmove Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 474 and the recent decision of the Supreme Court in MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v. Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24. He accepted that he was bound by authority to conclude that the payment of a lesser sum than the amount of a debt due cannot be a satisfaction of the debt unl…”
- Cited — Simantob v Shavleyan 2019-06-28
“…Finally, the uncertainty alluded to by Lord Sumption in MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v. Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24 at [18] is not engaged on the facts of this case. The consideration alleged here was the forbearance to rely on a penalty defence, not the expectation of some …”