- Cited — Syed Tahseen Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-09-28
“…order made under section 40(3) of the 1981 Act. This was in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeal Commission [2021] UKSC 7; [2021] AC 765 (R (Begum)) and subsequent decisions of UTIAC on the approach to such appeals.…”
- Explained — U3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-14
“…rticular: Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 29; [2003] 1 AC 153 (‘Rehman’) and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7; [2022] AC 765 (‘Begum’). Rehman did not concern section 2B. As I will explain, Begum did. The appeal also concerns SIAC’s powers under section 2 of the 1997 A…”
- Applied — Shyti v Secretary of State For The Home Department 2023-07-04
“… [2018] EWCA Civ 2483;[2018] 4 WLR 166 (‘ground 2’). The Secretary of State argues that the reasoning in R (Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7; [2021] AC 765 (‘Begum’) now applies to such appeals, as the UT has held in Ciceri (deprivation of citizenship appeals; principles) [2021] UKUT 00238 (IAC) (‘C…”
- Cited — Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Nasim Hussain & Ors 2023-06-26
“…ntion of Parliament to be discerned from the relevant statutory provisions. As Lord Reed PSC observed in R (Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7, [2021]AC 765 at [46]:…”
- Cited — C7 v Secrtary of State for the Home Department 2023-03-13
“… 40A(3) is to have effect in relation to such appeals. The nature of such an appeal was one of the issues in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2021] UKSC 7; [2022] 1 WLR 3784. In short, and contrary to the impression which might be conveyed by the terse language of section 2B, it is not straightforwardly an appeal…”
- Considered — QX v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-11-22
“…ry of State ‘a large margin of judgment’ (paragraph 31). She considered the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2021] UKSC 7; [2021] AC 765. She quoted paragraphs 60 and 62 of Lord Reed’s judgment in Begum, in which he cited passages from the speech of Lord Hoffmann in Rehman [2003] …”
- Cited — Laci v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-05-20
“…gment was circulated to counsel in draft, Mr Malik drew our attention to the decision of the Supreme Court in R(Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2021] UKSC 7, [2021] 2 WLR 556, which was handed down subsequent to the argument before us. Begum concerns a decision taken by the Secretary of State to deprive the appella…”