How many times has Birmingham City Council v Mrs H [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) been cited?

Birmingham City Council v Mrs H [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) is cited by 5 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Birmingham City Council v Mrs H [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam)

EWHC-Family · cited by 5 · influence score 17/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Considered · 1Applied · 1

Cited — T and J (Children) 2020-10-20
“…ng of findings of fact in these circumstances, the court must adopt a three-stage process, first set out by Charles J in Birmingham City Council v H and others [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) and endorsed by Sir James Munby P in Re ZZ and Others[2014] EWFC 9 and by this Court in Re E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) [2019] EWCA Civ 1447. At th…”
Cited — CTD (A Child: Rehearing) 2020-10-14
“…[2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam)…”
Cited — CTD (A Child: Rehearing) 2020-10-14
“…[2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam)…”
Considered — N (A Child) 2019-11-19
“…Peter Jackson LJ went on to consider the well-known line of cases of Birmingham City Council v H (No. 1) [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) (Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); (Re B) and Re ZZ [2014] EWFC 9 (Re ZZ) (Sir James Munby P). Summarising …”
Applied — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“…The test to be applied to applications for reopening has been established in a series of cases: Birmingham City Council v H (No. 1) [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) (Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); and Re ZZ [2014] EWFC 9 (Sir James Munby P).…”