How many times has [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) been cited?

[2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam)

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Followed · 1

Cited — CTD (A Child: Rehearing) 2020-10-14
“… number of decisions, of which three are significant: Birmingham City Council v H (No. 1)[2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam)(Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); and Re ZZ[2014] EWFC 9; [2015] 1 WLR 95 (Sir James Munby P). These establish that at the first stage the applicant must show that there are soli…”
Followed — N (A Child) 2019-11-19
“…went on to consider the well-known line of cases of Birmingham City Council v H (No. 1) [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) (Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); (Re B) and Re ZZ [2014] EWFC 9 (Re ZZ) (Sir James Munby P). Summarising the approach as follows, he said:…”
Cited — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“…eopening has been established in a series of cases: Birmingham City Council v H (No. 1) [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam) (Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); and Re ZZ [2014] EWFC 9 (Sir James Munby P).…”