- Cited — Kwok Ho Wan & Ors v UBS AG (London Branch) 2023-03-01
“…Lugano II is to be given an autonomous interpretation to ensure its uniform application(JSC BTA Bank v. Khrapunov and Ablyazov (No 14) [2018] UKSC 19, [2020] AC 727 (Ablyazov) per Lord Sumption and Lord Lloyd-Jones at [32]). The exceptions to the general rule that defendants are to be sued in their state of …”
- Cited — London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins Assoc Ltd v Kingdom of Spain 2021-11-04
“…Second, Mr Hancock relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov (No. 14) [2018] UKSC 19, [2020] AC 727 that contempt of court can constitute unlawful means for the purpose of the tort of conspiracy to injure, including the comment of Lord Sumption…”
- Cited — Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd 2021-03-10
“…h is the principal or substantial cause of the environmental damage”. That suggests that a comparison of causative potency is required. JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2018] UKSC 19, [2020] AC 727, on the other hand, holds that identification of “the event giving rise to the damage” when that concept is used in the context of Article 5 of …”
- Cited — The Racing Partnership Ltd & Ors v Sports Information Services Ltd 2020-10-09
“…In JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov (No 14) [2018] UKSC 19, [2018] 2 WLR 1125 Lord Sumption and Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom the other members of the panel agreed, again cited Lord Bridge’s statement in Lonhro v Fayed w…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor v Koza Altin Isletmeleri AS 2020-07-31
“…v Hobday [1989] 1 W.LR. 1143 at pp.1145-1146; Phonographic Performance Ltd v Reader [2005] F.S.R. 42 at [11]; and JSC BTA v Ablyazov (No.14) (a.k.a. Khrapunov) [2018] UKSC 19, [2018] 3 All ER 293, [2018] 2 W.L.R. 1125 at [23]; in which case what is alleged as a breach of the undertaking will be the invasion of a private law right. M…”
- Explained — Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd & Ors v Lawrie & Ors 2020-01-23
“…ss the loss is parasitic upon some injury to person or damage to property. As explained by Lord Sumption and Lord Lloyd-Jones in JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov(No 14) [2018] UKSC 19; [2018] 2 WLR 1125, para 7, the modern law of conspiracy developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as a basis for imposing civil liability…”
- Cited — Phonographic Performance Ltd v Ellis (t/a Bla Bla Bar) 2018-12-18
“…) upon a motion to commit: Midland Marts Ltd v Hobday [1989] 1 WLR 1143. That was one of the cases referred to with approval in JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov (No 14) [2018] UKSC 19, [2018] 2 WLR 1125 at [23] in support of the proposition that “breach of an order of the court is actionable where it gives effect to an underlying private law…”
- Explained — Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV 2018-11-21
“…ontextual justification for these heads of special jurisdiction is explained in the judgment of Lord Sumption and Lord Lloyd-Jones in JSC BTA Bank v Khrapunov, [2018] UKSC 19, at [31]: [2018] 2 WLR 1125 (SC).…”
- Cited — Eurasia Sports Ltd v Aguad 2018-07-24
“… cases of conspiracy suggest that the place where the harmful event occurred is the place where the conspiracy was hatched (see JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov (No.14) [2018] UKSC 19; [2018] 2 WLR 1125), that would not help the claimant here.…”
- Cited — Khrapunov v JSC BTA Bank 2018-04-24
“… son-in-law. As observed by the Supreme Court, the litigation between the Bank, Mr Ablyazov and the appellant is on a large scale: see JSC BTA Bank v Khrapunov [2018] UKSC 19, at [1].…”