- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…) of the 1996 Act was, however, inserted into section 58 of the 1985 Act in the light of the decision in R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex p. Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484. The House of Lords had there held that “accommodation” had to be capable of being “properly … described as accommodation within the ordinary meaning of that w…”
- Cited — Michala Hodge v Folkestone and Hythe District Council 2023-07-27
“…The submissions centred on three decisions of the House of Lords: R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer’), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Cou…”
- Cited — Shamso Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing 2022-07-15
“…r the review decision was lawful. The facts are for the reviewing officer. The court has no independent fact-finding function (R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Pulhofer [1986] AC 484); although a finding of fact may be challenged on public law grounds: Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5, [2006] 2 AC 430, 462.…”
- Cited — Abdelmotalib Elkundi & Ors. (R on the application of) v Birmingham City Council 2022-05-04
“…R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, Ex p Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484…”
- Cited — Ciftci v London Borough of Haringey 2021-11-26
“…er the review decision was lawful. The facts are for the reviewing officer. The court has no independent fact-finding function (R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Pulhofer[1986] AC 484); although a finding of fact may be challenged on public law grounds: Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC[2003] UKHL 5, [2006] 2 AC 430, 462.…”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…this case. We do not need to decide how it would have fared in 1983, any more than we need to speculate upon how it might be decided now. In the Puhlhofer case [1986] AC 484 the statutory duty to provide accommodation for the homeless was clearly expressed in terms that the local authority was satisfied that the criteria existed, a…”