- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…cision that proper consideration has been given to the relevant matters required by the Act and the Code” (Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549, at paragraph 32, per Baroness Hale, with whom Lords Clarke, Reed, Hughes and Toulson agreed).…”
- Cited — Katie-Leigh Webb-Harnden v London Borough of Waltham Forest 2023-08-22
“…ph 32 of her judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549.…”
- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“…cision that proper consideration has been given to the relevant matters required by the Act and the Code” (Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549, at paragraph 32, per Baroness Hale, with whom Lords Clarke, Reed, Hughes and Toulson agreed).…”
- Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“…[2015] PTSR 549…”
- Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“… and where possible, try to place the household as close as possible to where they were previously living (Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549 at [19]). This principle, described in argument as the “concentric circles” approach, is essentially a judge-made expansion of section 208 which is now include…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…ision that proper consideration has been given to the relevant matters required by the Act and the Code” (Nzolameso v Westminster City Council, [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549 (“Nzolameso”), at paragraph 32, per Baroness Hale, with whom Lords Clarke, Reed, Hughes and Toulson agreed).…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…d in paragraph 48 of the 2012 Supplementary Guidance but also the effect of various intervening decisions, in particular that of the Supreme Court in Nzolameso [2015] PTSR 549.”…”
- Cited — Shamso Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing 2022-07-15
“…ar as reasonably practicable”. The leading case on section 208 (1) is the decision of the Supreme Court in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] PTSR 549. That was a case in which Westminster offered an applicant accommodation in Bletchley near Milton Keynes. The Supreme Court held that Westminster had not demon…”
- Cited — Abdelmotalib Elkundi & Ors. (R on the application of) v Birmingham City Council 2022-05-04
“…d the desirability of housing authorities having such policies at paragraphs 39 and 40 of her judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22l; [2015] PTSR 549.…”
- Cited — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…Baroness Hale summarised the resulting law in these terms in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549, at paragraph 19:…”
- Cited — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“…In Nzolameso v Westminster County Council [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] PTSR 549 the Supreme Court was concerned with a s. 204 appeal against a review decision that ‘out of borough’ accommodation offered to the applicant had been suitable. …”
- Explained — Z & Aanor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Hackney & Anor 2019-06-27
“…ular case. But a general policy may explain how individual decisions are made consistently with that statutory duty: Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549.…”
- Applied — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…This duty applies both at the stage of formulating policy and also at the stage when individual decisions are made: Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549 at [24]. We are concerned in these appeals only with the stage of formulation of policy.…”
- Applied — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“…The leading case on section 208 is the decision of the Supreme Court in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council[2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549, allowing an appeal from this court: [2014] EWCA Civ 1383, [2015] PTSR 211. Ms Nzolameso applied to Westminster as a homeless person. She was a single mother w…”
- Approved — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…mmodation is also a key factor. In R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC [2001] 1 WLR 563, 575 (approved by the Supreme Court in Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549) Latham LJ put it this way:…”
- Cited — Davies v Hertfordshire County Council 2018-03-06
“…uzrat v Hounslow London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1865; [2014] HLR 17 Mohamoud, cited; footnote one above, and Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] PTSR 549.…”