- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…court’s jurisdiction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality …”
- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“…court’s jurisdiction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality …”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…court’s jurisdiction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality …”
- Cited — Shamso Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing 2022-07-15
“…g function (R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Pulhofer [1986] AC 484); although a finding of fact may be challenged on public law grounds: Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5, [2006] 2 AC 430, 462.…”
- Applied — Taryn Baptie v The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames 2022-06-30
“…t, again, to exercise a supervisory jurisdiction over the decision of the public authority, applying judicial review principles: Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 1 AC 430 [7], Danesh v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC [2006] EWCA Civ 1404, [2007] 1 WLR 69 [30]. This court has warned against “judicialisation of claims t…”
- Applied — Lisa Paley v The London Borough of Waltham Forest 2022-02-04
“…[2003] UKHL 5; [2003] 1 AC 430 at [7] to mean that the court must apply the principles of judicial review to such an appeal and the judge must conduct the same analysis as w…”
- Cited — Ciftci v London Borough of Haringey 2021-11-26
“…ing function (R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Pulhofer[1986] AC 484); although a finding of fact may be challenged on public law grounds: Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC[2003] UKHL 5, [2006] 2 AC 430, 462.…”
- Applied — LB v London Borough of Tower Hamlets 2020-03-24
“… in law in the decision that she had taken, the test being in substance that applied by the High Court on judicial review: see Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5 at [7] per Lord Bingham of Cornhill.…”
- Cited — Langton, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs & Anor 2019-09-17
“…that it would serve the statutory purpose of preventing the spread of disease. Mr Turney cited authorities such as Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5; [2003] 2 AC 430, [7], per Lord Bingham, [99], per Lord Millett; IBA Health Ltd v Office of Fair Trading [2004] EWCA Civ 142; [2004] ICR 1364, [93], per Carnwa…”
- Cited — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…dgment. The principles upon which an appeal court acts in cases of this kind are authoritatively stated by the House of Lords in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430. Lord Bingham said at [7]:…”
- Cited — Rother District Council v Freeman-Roach 2018-03-06
“…iscussion of the issues before the Court with a reference to the statement by Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430 at [114]. Lord Walker stressed that establishing priority need may call for the exercise, and sometimes for a very difficult exercise, of eval…”