- Cited — MAH (Egypt) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-02-28
“…rly sensitive context of a claim for asylum, in which there is the need for the “most anxious scrutiny”: Bugdaycay v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1987] AC 514, at 531 (Lord Bridge of Harwich).…”
- Cited — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…The phrase “anxious scrutiny” in the context of a rationality challenge was first used in R v Home Secretary ex parte Bugdaycay [1987] AC 514 at 531. The issue in that case related to the risk that the appellant, whose claim for asylum had been rejected, might find, if returned to a third country, th…”
- Applied — Asiweh v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-01-23
“…strate that account has been taken of relevant matters and the correct test has been applied: see R v Secretaryof State for the Home Department, ex p Bugdaycay [1987] AC 514, 537-8 and the cases listed in Fordham’s Judicial Review Handbook (6th ed.) at 42.2.2.”…”
- Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Bugdaycay [1987] AC 514, where Lord Bridge said at page 531:…”
- Cited — Bajracharya, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-02-22
“…he reasoning in [R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Khawaja [1984] AC 74] and [R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Bugdaycay [1987] AC 514], their findings on such matters are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings only on Wednesbury principles; it is not a situation in which their power…”