- Cited — Star China Media Limited, R v The Office of Communications 2023-07-14
“… been struck between the rights of the individual and the interests of the community (confirmed in R (Lord Carlile) v Secretary ofState for the Home Department [2015] AC 945 at [34]), and (b) Lord Reed’s judgment in Bank Mellat at [68]-[76]. Thus, he said that the “less restrictive means” element of proportionality did not mean the…”
- Cited — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“… Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No.2) [2013] UKSC 39, [2014] AC 700, at paragraphs 69-70 and Lord Sumption in R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC) v SSHD [2014] UKSC 60, [2015] AC 945, at paragraph 20 where Lord Reed’s statement that “… the intensity [of review] – that is to say, the degree of weight or respect given to the assessment of the…”
- Cited — Campaign Against Arms Trade, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for International Trade 2019-06-20
“…ples of public law at [25]-[38]. Having cited Kennedy v Charity Commission [2015] AC 455 at [51], R (Lord Carlile) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] AC 945 at [32] and [88], Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2003] 1 AC 153 at [50] and [57], A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2…”
- Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…Some support for this conclusion can be found in the judgment of Lord Sumption in R (Lord Carlile of Berriew) v SSHD [2015] AC 945where, at [32] he said:…”