How many times has [1996] QB 517 been cited?

[1996] QB 517 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1996] QB 517

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1996] QB 517

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Followed · 1Cited · 1

Considered — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…The Divisional Court considered R v Ministry of Defence ex parte Smith [1996] QB 517 in relation to the intensity of review in a human rights context but held that there was in this case no human rights context. This was because any fundamental…”
Followed — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…This approach was followed in later cases and in particular in ex parte Smith [1996] QB 517 at page 554E-F where Sir Thomas Bingham MR set out the following approach to a rationality challenge:…”
Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith [1996] QB 517 where Lord Bingham said at page 556:…”