How many times has [1996] AC 514 been cited?

[1996] AC 514 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1996] AC 514

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1996] AC 514

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“… That submission reflected the fact that equitable compensation and an account of profits are alternative remedies. In Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd [1996] AC 514, Lord Nicholls said in this connection at 521:…”
Cited — Glossop Cartons and Print Ltd & Ors v Contact (Print & Packaging) Ltd & Ors 2021-05-07
“…to elect between their contractual remedy and their remedy in deceit (see Lord Nicholls in Personal Representatives of Tang Man Sit v. Capacious Investments Ltd[1996] AC 514 at page 521), or that (b) RJP ought to have been required to give credit for the £50,000 they allegedly underpaid for Unit 3 (its market value was £250,000 as …”