How many times has [2010] QB 27 been cited?

[2010] QB 27 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] QB 27

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2010] QB 27

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Soteria Insurance Limited (formerly CIS General Insurance Limited) v IBM United Kingdom Limited 2022-04-04
“…That point was taken up by Moore-Bick LJ in Stocznia Gdynia SA v Gearbulk Holdings Limited [2010] QB 27, where he said:…”
Cited — Glossop Cartons and Print Ltd & Ors v Contact (Print & Packaging) Ltd & Ors 2021-05-07
“…I do not think that the court can or should make any such implication (see, for example, Moore-Bick LJ at [22]-[23] in Stocznia Gdynia v. Gearbulk Holdings Ltd [2010] QB 27).…”
Cited — JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v The Federal Republic of Nigeria 2019-10-08
“…ern approach to the construction of commercial contracts. He referred to the more recent case of Stocznia Gdynia SA v Gearbulk Holdings Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 75, [2010] QB 27. That case concerned three contracts for the sale of vessels to the purchaser. The seller repudiated the contract and the question arose whether the buyer was …”