How many times has [1997] R.P.C. 1 been cited?

[1997] R.P.C. 1 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1997] R.P.C. 1

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1997] R.P.C. 1

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“… of primary fact, but also to the evaluation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] R.P.C. 1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23; [2007] 1 W.L.R. 1325 ; Re B (A Child) …”
Cited — H, Re (Children: Findings of Fact) 2021-03-05
“…“If I may quote what I said in Biogen Inc. v. Medeva Pic. [1997] R.P.C. 1, 45:…”
Cited — Lowe v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-01-25
“…Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] R.P.C. 1…”