How many times has [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360 been cited?

[1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Alison Kynaston-Mainwaring v GVE London Limited 2022-10-19
“…uation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] R.P.C.1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23; [2007] 1 W.L.R. 1325; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013]…”
Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“…ation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] R.P.C. 1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23; [2007] 1 W.L.R. 1325 ; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings) [2013] UKSC 33; [2013] 1 …”
Cited — Lowe v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-01-25
“…Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1360…”