How many times has [2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477 been cited?

[2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Alison Kynaston-Mainwaring v GVE London Limited 2022-10-19
“… Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 33; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 1911 and most recently and comprehensively McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477. These are all decisions either of the House of Lords or of the Supreme Court. The reasons for this approach are many. They include…”
Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“….L.R. 1325 ; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings) [2013] UKSC 33; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 1911 and most recently and comprehensively McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477. These are all decisions either of the House of Lords or of the Supreme Court. The reasons for this approach are many. They include…”
Cited — Lowe v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-01-25
“…[2013] UKSC 58; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 2477…”