- Cited — Kanwarjit Singh Juj v John Lewis Partnership Plc 2023-12-21
“…only to findings of primary fact, but also to the evaluation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. (Staechelin & others v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817 at [29], Fage UK Ltd v Chobani UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 5). An appellate court should not interfere with the trial judge’s conclusions on primary facts unless it…”
- Cited — Vale SA v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor 2023-11-24
“…[2019] EWCA Civ 817…”
- Considered — CDE v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust 2023-11-14
“…o be adopted when considering interfering with findings of fact made by the trial judge. They are set out by Lewison LJ in Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 817 at [29]:…”
- Cited — George David Clements-Siddall v Dunbobbin Hotels Limited 2023-11-07
“…ble judge could have reached on the available evidence, or to have reached a conclusion that was rationally unsupportable: see Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817 at [29]-[39] for a convenient summary, which I bear in mind but does not need to be set out in full here.…”
- Cited — Gabriele Volpi & Anor. v Matteo Volpi 2022-04-05
“… 2600; Elliston v Glencore Services (UK) Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 407; JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2018] EWCA Civ 1176, [2019] BCC 96; Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817, [2019] 3 All ER 429 and Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5, [2020] AC 352.…”
- Cited — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12
“…This court said in ACLBDD Holdings Ltd v Staechelin [2019] EWCA Civ 817, [2019] 3 All ER 429:…”
- Cited — Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police & Ors v Dyer & Ors 2020-10-27
“…R (SS) (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1391 and [38] of the judgment of Lewison LJ in Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817. However, whatever the values of or limitations as to assessment of demeanour, that assessment is for the fact-finder in any court, here the jury, and not for …”
- Cited — Z & Aanor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Hackney & Anor 2019-06-27
“… whole of the evidence into its consideration: Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41, [2014] 1 WLR 2600 at [48]; ACLBDD Holdings Ltd v Staechelin [2019] EWCA Civ 817 at [31]. Second, an appeal court should be reluctant to interfere with a lower court’s findings of fact, even where those findings are based on written rather …”