How many times has [2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch) been cited?

[2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch)

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Industrial Cleaning Equipment (Southampton) Limited v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment Holdings Co Ltd & Anor 2023-12-06
“…e trade mark, and if not whether it would have been reasonable for the user to carry out a search: see in particular Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Lee [2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch), [2012] FSR 7 at [118](i).…”
Cited — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“…inference that there is no such confusion or deception”. It is sufficient to repeat what I said in Jack Wills and in Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Lee [2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch), [2012] FSR 7 at [95]:…”
Cited — UK Gymnastics Ltd & Ors v British Amateur Gymnastics Association 2021-03-24
“…there has been for confusion to occur and what opportunity there has been for any such confusion to be detected: see Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Lee [2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch), [2012] FSR 7 at [95]. The judge at [130] accepted BAGA’s submission that the small scale of UKG’s operations (compared with that of BAGA) meant that it was ve…”