How many times has [2001] 1 WLR 1311 been cited?

[2001] 1 WLR 1311 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] 1 WLR 1311

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] 1 WLR 1311

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Followed · 1

Cited — Apache North Sea Ltd v Euroil Exploration Ltd & Anor 2020-10-30
“…] CLC 561 at 575); it could not be said that it "exceeded the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible" (see Tanfern v Cameron-MacDonald [2001] 1 WLR 1311 at [32]).…”
Followed — R (A Child) 2019-05-24
“…nder the first limb of the relevant sub-rule is that the appeal would have a real prospect of success. As stated in Tanfern v Cameron-MacDonald (Practice Note) [2001] 1 WLR 1311 CA at [21], which itself follows Swain v Hillman…”