- Considered — Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2023-07-26
“…tablished in Taylor v. Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 and have most recently been considered by this court in Municipio de Mariana v. BHP Group plc [2021] EWCA Civ 1156, [2022] 1 WLR 919 (Municipio de Mariana) and UCP plc v. Nectrus Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 949, [2023] 1 WLR 39 (UCP). It is worth noting that UCP was a case where an…”
- Cited — C7 v Secrtary of State for the Home Department 2023-03-13
“…are an essential analytical tool for the court, to enable it to identify the issues which it is being asked to decide, see Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group plc [2021] EWCA Civ 1156; [2022] 1 WLR 919 at paragraphs 113 and 114, and a Skeleton Argument is not the vehicle to use to introduce new grounds of appeal. In any event the relevant pa…”
- Cited — UCP Plc v Nectrus Limited 2022-07-11
“…said that the tests adumbrated in a series of recent cases were satisfied (see the summary of the law at [57]-[64] in Municipio de Mariana and v. BHP Group plc [2021] EWCA Civ 1156, [2022] 1 WLR 919Practice Note (Municipio de Mariana)). In essence, Mr McGrath submitted that the integrity of the second PTA application had been critically u…”
- Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…he latter’s refusal of permission. The judgment of this court granting permission to appeal in respect of all four applications has the neutral citation number [2021] EWCA Civ 1156 (“the PTA Judgment”).…”
- Cited — Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v Pope 2022-01-14
“…ied that “the integrity of the [permission to appeal] process has been undermined” was repeated by this Court in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group plc(“Mariana”)[2021] EWCA Civ 1156 (a case in which exceptionally the application to reopen succeeded) and more recently still in R (Khan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2021] EWCA…”
- Cited — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“…ce which was given by this Court in McDonald v Rose[2019] EWCA Civ 4; [2019] 1 WLR 2828, at para. 21 (Underhill LJ); and in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group plc[2021] EWCA Civ 1156, at paras. 113-114 (Sir Geoffrey Vos MR). I will not set out that guidance again here but it is essential reading and needs to be read in full.…”