- Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“…, [2022] AC 1158. At [47] Lord Hamblen and Lord Stephens described the two stage test laid down by the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, [2008] QB 73 and Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch 481, which I have summarised in paragraph 20 above, as “well established”.…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2006] EWCA Civ 1714, [2008] QB 73 at [11]:…”
- Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“…[2005] EWHC 3003 (QB), [2006] EMLR 10 [77] (affirmed [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, [2008] QB 73 [50-51]). But that is not what this case is about. Here, the relevant relationship is that between the mother and the father. Although the father’s privacy rig…”
- Cited — HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited 2021-12-02
“…See McKennitt v. Ash [2008] QB 73, per Buxton LJ [50], and [2005] EWHC 3003 (QB) per Eady J at [77].…”
- Applied — ZXC v Bloomberg LP 2020-05-15
“…Liability for misuse of information is determined by applying a two-stage test summarised by Buxton LJ in McKennitt v. Ash [2008] QB 73 (CA) at [11]:…”
- Doubted — Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery 2020-02-12
“… a matter of principle, of protecting privacy rights, at least in a domestic home, that doubt has been removed by Article 8. Having referred to McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, he said (at [171]) that external prying into a home would contravene the privacy protected by Article 8, even without photography. He also said (at [174]) tha…”
- Cited — L v Q Ltd 2019-08-09
“…See McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at paragraph 11.…”