- Cited — Derhalli v Derhalli 2021-02-02
“…All other things being equal, the matrimonial home will be treated as matrimonial property and subject to the sharing principle (Miller v Miller [2006] 2 AC 618 [22]);…”
- Cited — Finch v Baker 2021-01-28
“…to appeal on these grounds and it is simply not open to her to seek to reargue them in this appeal. As was made clear in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 the relevance of conduct is to be determined in accordance with the provisions of section 25(2)(g) of the 1973 Act. As Lord Nicholls said, at [65], it cannot a…”
- Considered — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“… or she selects to determine this issue leads to an award which, to quote Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 2 AC 618, [2006] 2 WLR 1283, [2006] 1 FLR 1186, at para [27], the judge considers gives 'to the contribution made by one party's non-matrimonial property the weight he …”
- Cited — Martin v Martin (Rev 1) 2018-12-21
“… can be said that “valuations are often a matter of opinion on which experts differ”, as referred to by Lord Nicholls in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618, at [26]. However, it would be right to note that valuations will clearly fall into different categories. At one end, there might be a very active market with …”
- Cited — Martin v Martin (Rev 1) 2018-12-21
“…McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618…”
- Cited — Villiers v Villiers 2018-05-17
“…[2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 2 AC 618, paras 16, 141.…”
- Cited — Waggott v Waggott 2018-04-11
“…This is important because of the obligation on the courts to achieve, what Lord Nicholls in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 (“Miller”) (para 6) referred to as, “an acceptable degree of consistency of decision from one case to the next”. I would also note in passing that the statisti…”