- Cited — Ratcliffe v Ratcliffe 2021-03-01
“…termination into the section 25 discretionary exercise. The court will have to decide, adopting Wilson LJ's formulation of the broad approach in the Jones case [2012] Fam 1, what award of such lesser percentage than 50% makes fair allowance for the parties' wealth in part comprising or reflecting the product of non-marital endeavo…”
- Applied — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“… the Company. The expert had considered whether to apply “the concept of ‘spring-board’ value” which he took from family law cases, in particular Jones v Jones [2012] Fam 1 (“Jones”), as meaning “additional value which was present in the company at the valuation date, but could not have been recognised at the time and would only h…”
- Cited — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…iness that was created before the marriage on a linear apportionment basis) is appropriate in this case. As Arden LJ noted in Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, [2012] Fam 1, [2011] 3 WLR 582, [2011] 1 FLR 1723, the court must try to look as far as it can at the reality of what actually happened rather than proceed on an artificial…”
- Applied — Martin v Martin (Rev 1) 2018-12-21
“…Mr Pointer also submitted that the judge’s approach had been rejected by this court in Jones v Jones [2012] Fam 1. In his submission, the judge should have applied the approach adopted by Wilson LJ (as he then was) in that case in order to determine the current value of th…”
- Considered — Waggott v Waggott 2018-04-11
“…Wilson LJ had further considered the question of the relevance of an earning capacity in Jones v Jones [2012] Fam 1. I propose only to quote part of what comprises (paras 21 to 28) a detailed consideration of its potential relevance.…”