- Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“… Dyson in Weller at [20]-[31] and [63]. That this is a significant, but not determinative, factor was confirmed by the Supreme Court in Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131 at [95]-[98] (Lord Toulson, with whom Lord Hodge agreed) and [113]-[114] (Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, with whom Lord Hodge also agreed).…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131 and now in…”
- Cited — HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited 2021-12-02
“…he were dealing with a state intervention under article 8(2) (or article 10(2)) where the interference must be necessary in a democratic society (see In re JR38[2016] AC 1131 (JR38) at [67] and [72]). The defendant referred to the judge’s use of the formulation “necessary or proportionate” at [28], [96], [105], [112], [119], [120], …”
- Approved — ZXC v Bloomberg LP 2020-05-15
“…ood) v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [22], in a passage approved of by Lord Toulson (with whom Lord Hodge agreed) in In re JR38 [2016] AC 1131 at [87]. Once this threshold of seriousness is passed, the enquiry is broad and may involve a number of circumstances, see the judgment of the Court (Sir Antho…”
- Cited — Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery 2020-02-12
“…no cause of action. Article 8 is not limited in that way and so will in principle confer a right on anyone who has a reasonable expectation of privacy: Re JR38 [2016] AC 1131; Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43, [2004] 1 AC 983, [50], [82], [89]. As Lord Lloyd said in Hunter (at p.698B/C), to allow the wife or daugh…”
- Cited — Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough of Ealing 2019-08-21
“…sonable expectation of privacy or, which the authorities treat as synonymous, a legitimate expectation of protection: see, for example, Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131, at [84]-[88].…”
- Cited — Butt, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-08
“…public place: R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] AC 1065, and Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131. Although the Supreme Court judgments in those two cases set out the relevant principles, Catt was only addressed by Mr Bowen at the very end of his opening or…”