- Cited — Stephen Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Limited 2021-11-16
“…At para. 92, the ET referred to the decision of the House of Lords in SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle[2009] UKHL 37; [2009] ICR 1056. It directed itself, in accordance with that decision, that the word “likely” in the present context means something that could well occur, as opposed to somet…”
- Cited — All Answers Ltd v W & Anor 2021-04-30
“…terial to this case, as “likely to last at least 12 months”. “Likely” in this context means “could well happen”: see Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd. [2009] UKHL 37, [2009] ICR 1056, per Lord Hope at paragraph 4, and Lord Rodger at paragraph 42, Baroness Hale at paragraphs 70 to 72 (with whom Lord Neuberger agreed at paragraph 81), Lord Br…”
- Cited — Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey 2019-06-21
“…as elsewhere in the Schedule”, it meant “could well happen”. He plainly had in mind the decision of the House of Lords in SCA Packaging v Boyle [2009] UKHL 37, [2009] ICR 1056, which gave that interpretation to the same language in paragraph 6 of Schedule 1. In his oral submissions Mr Strelitz accepted that that was right and that Mo…”