“…In McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] EWCA Civ 4; [2008] ICR 431 the Court of Appeal had to consider the phrase “likely to recur” in para. 2(2) of Sch. 1 to the 1995 Act. In reversing the decision of the EAT,…”
“…The respondent appealed to the EAT. The EAT referred to the decision of the Court of Appeal in McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] EWCA Civ 4, [2008] ICR 431, as authority for the proposition that the employment tribunal should have determined whether the impairment existed at the time of the acts of…”