How many times has [2009] STC 254 been cited?

[2009] STC 254 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] STC 254

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2009] STC 254

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Banca Intesa Sanpaolo SpA & Anor v Comune Di Venezia 2023-12-13
“…e relying upon the supposed validity of a void transaction. Mr Paul also referred to the decisions of Henderson J in the FII litigation ([2008] EWHC 2893 (Ch); [2009] STC 254 and [2014] EWHC 4302 (Ch); [2015] STC 1471) that the Revenue should not be entitled to rely on change of position as a defence to a Woolwich claim, because suc…”
Cited — Jazztel Plc v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-02-25
“…KHL 34, [2008] 1 AC 561 and the judgment of Henderson J in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Revenue and Customs Commissioners[2008] EWHC 2893 (Ch), [2009] STC 254, at [405] to [406].…”