How many times has [2022] AC 1 been cited?

[2022] AC 1 is cited by 5 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2022] AC 1

· cited by 5 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2022] AC 1

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 4Applied · 1

Cited — Banca Intesa Sanpaolo SpA & Anor v Comune Di Venezia 2023-12-13
“…[2020] UKSC 47; [2022] AC 1 (“…”
Cited — BT Plc v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-12-04
“…tation Act 1980 and in any event the claim would be out of time under the test established in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HMRC [2020] UKSC 47, [2022] AC 1 (“FII 2020”) (the “9-month claim issue”).…”
Applied — Saddiq Omar Abu Seedo v Fahmy El Gamal 2023-03-30
“…I also note that this approach is consistent with the Supreme Court’s analysis in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HMRC [2022] AC 1, recently applied in the context of section 32(1)(b) by the Court of Appeal in Gemalto Holdings BV v Infineon Technologies AG [2022] EWCA Civ 782. See in parti…”
Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…Similarly, in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HMRC [2020] UKSC 47, [2022] AC 1, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge said:…”
Cited — Jazztel Plc v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-02-25
“…ct within the meaning of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980: see Test Claimants in theFII Group Litigation v Revenue and Customs Commissioners[2020] UKSC 47, [2022] AC 1, at [7] per Lord Reed PSC and Lord Hodge DPSC giving the judgment of the majority with which Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen JJSC agreed. We will refer to th…”