How many times has [2013] 1 AC 182 been cited?

[2013] 1 AC 182 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 1 AC 182

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] 1 AC 182

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“… a limitation and any attempt to do so would exceed the appropriate bounds of interpretation and usurp the function of Parliament. As Hughes LJ put it in Perry [2013] 1 AC 182, to do so would involve illegitimately re-writing the statute.”…”
Cited — Jimenez, R. (On the Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 2019-01-31
“…Wiggins [1980] 1 WLR 815 at page 819A-B. This principle can be seen in operation in the decision of the Supreme Court in Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry [2013] 1 AC 182 where SOCA commenced proceedings against Mr Perry and members of his family for a civil recovery order under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“POCA 20…”