How many times has [2016] AC 849 been cited?

[2016] AC 849 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] AC 849

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2016] AC 849

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…nk disclosure and the court retains jurisdiction – see, for example, Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] AC 871 and Gohil v Gohil (No 2) [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] AC 849.…”
Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…er: see In re L (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Review) [2103] 1 WLR 634. This and other procedural issues do, however, arise in Gohil v Gohil (No 2) [2016] AC 849, which was heard at the same time as this case. In L v L [2008] 1 FLR 26,Munby J described this problem as “a procedural quagmire”: para 39. There are three po…”