- Considered — Delve & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions 2020-09-15
“…rea of the law were reviewed by Baroness Hale DPSC in Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency), Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343 (‘Essop’). The first claim considered in that appeal concerned black and minority ethnic civil servants over the age of 35 who challenged the requirement that …”
- Cited — McNeil & Ors v Revenue And Customs 2019-07-03
“…ale in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Homer[2012] UKSC 15, [2012] ICR 704, (esp. at para. 14 (pp. 709-710)) and Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343: in the latter she emphasises the “salient features” common to all the various iterations of the indirect discrimination concept (see paras. 23-29 (pp. 13534))…”
- Cited — Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd (Rev 2) 2019-05-24
“…On behalf of Mr Hextall, Mr Leach complains that the ET’s reasoning failed correctly to identify the indirect discrimination pool. In Essop v Home Office [2017] 1 WLR 1343 Baroness Hale of Richmond referred at [41] to the statutory code of practice prepared by the Equality and Human Rights Commission under section 14 of the…”
- Cited — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…A provision, criterion or practice is usually described as a “PCP”. As Lady Hale put it in Essop v Home Office [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] 1 WLR 1343 at [25]:…”