- Cited — Fratila & Anor v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Anor 2020-12-18
“…other EU nationals, e.g. from France or Germany, were not excluded. The point is made clear by the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Coll) v SSWP for Justice [2017] 1 WLR 2093, per Lade Hale at para. 30:…”
- Cited — AR & SXC, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2020-01-29
“…In R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40; [2017] 1 WLR 2093, at para. 40, Lady Hale DPSC said that:…”
- Cited — Z & Aanor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Hackney & Anor 2019-06-27
“…Mr Wise also referred us to the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 | [2017] 1 WLR 2093. That was a case about the applicability of an exemption from the prohibition on direct discrimination on the ground of sex, if (a) a joint service for persons…”
- Cited — Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd (Rev 2) 2019-05-24
“…003] ICR 337, Lockwood v Department of Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1195 [2014] 1 All ER 250 and R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40, [2017] 1 WLR 2093 but they do not appear to us to add anything about the requirements of a comparator beyond the plain words of section 23(1). The passages to which she referred…”
- Followed — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…prescriptively phrased. I would prefer to follow the form of declaration made by the Supreme Court in R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40, [2017] 1 WLR 2093 at [45]. That would result in a declaration that the impugned provisions of the policy constitute indirect discrimination against Irish Travellers and non-UK n…”