- Cited — Nokia Technologies OY & Anor. v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors. 2022-07-11
“…jurisdictional challenge in the Conversant case failed in the High Court and Court of Appeal was that, by virtue of the Brussels I Regulation as interpreted in Case C-281/02 Owusu v Jackson [EU:C:2005:120], it was not possible for the court to decline jurisdiction over the English defendants on the ground of forum non conveniens. F…”
- Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02)…”
- Cited — Manek & Ors v IIFL Wealth (UK) Ltd & Ors (2) 2021-05-04
“…stered in the UK, so in other circumstances it could have insisted on being sued here, regardless of the position of the other Defendants: see Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) [2005] QB 801. In any event, both the First and the Fourth Defendants have acknowledged the jurisdiction of the English courts. That means that this claim is …”
- Cited — Gray v Hurley 2019-12-12
“…[2010] 1 WLR 1023 at [50]. He then surveyed the provisions of the Judgments Regulation and referred to the decision of the Court of Justice in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) [2005] QB 801, [2005] 2 All ER (Comm) 577 at [37], where Article 2 of the Brussels Convention 1968 (the predecessor to Article 4(1)) was held to be mandatory …”
- Cited — JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Kolomoisky & Ors 2019-10-15
“…Lord Pannick also placed considerable reliance upon the decision of the CJEU in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) [2005] QB 801, that a national court with jurisdiction over a defendant under article 2 by virtue of his domicile in that state cannot decline jurisdiction on…”