- Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“… stay, recognising that a claim should only be stayed on such grounds in “rare and compelling circumstances” (Reichold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173) and, in a case where there is an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of England, where there are “exceptionally strong grounds” for a stay (Mazur Media Lt…”
- Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“… a claim pending in another forum, but a stay should only be granted in ‘rare and compelling circumstances’: Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173, 186).…”
- Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“… the interests of justice than by allowing the English proceedings to continue without a temporary stay: see Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173. But this would be justified only in rare or compelling circumstances: see per Lord Bingham CJ [2000] 1 WLR 173 at 185-186, and Klöckner Holdings GmbH v Klöckn…”
- Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“… the interests of justice than by allowing the English proceedings to continue without a temporary stay: see Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173. But this would be justified only in rare or compelling circumstances: see per Lord Bingham CJ [2000] 1 WLR 173 at 185-186, and Klöckner Holdings GmbH v Klöckn…”
- Cited — Nokia Technologies OY & Anor. v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors. 2022-07-11
“… the interests of justice than by allowing the English proceedings to continue without a temporary stay: see Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173. But this would be justified only in rare or compelling circumstances: see per Lord Bingham CJ [2000] 1 WLR 173 at 185–186, and Klöckner Holdings GmbH v Klöckn…”
- Cited — Nokia Technologies OY & Anor. v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors. 2022-07-11
“… the interests of justice than by allowing the English proceedings to continue without a temporary stay: see Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173. But this would be justified only in rare or compelling circumstances: see per Lord Bingham CJ [2000] 1 WLR 173 at 185–186, and Klöckner Holdings GmbH v Klöckn…”
- Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…3) Senior Court’s Act 1981 and CPR 3.1(2)(f). It will only exercise it in rare and compelling circumstances (Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173, 186C). It cannot do so in a manner inconsistent with Brussels Recast (see e.g. Mazur at para. [69]).…”
- Cited — Minister of Finance (Incorporated) v 1Malaysia Development Berhad & Ors 2019-11-26
“…[2000] 1 WLR 173…”