How many times has [2002] EWCA Civ 1134 been cited?

[2002] EWCA Civ 1134 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] EWCA Civ 1134

· cited by 4 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 4

Cited — Ho v Adelekun 2020-04-09
“…be remembered that this Court is relatively slow to interfere with costs orders. Sir Murray Stuart-Smith said this about costs appeals in Adamson v Halifax plc [2002] EWCA Civ 1134, [2003] 1 WLR 60 (at paragraph 16):…”
Cited — Bishop & Anor v Transport for London 2019-04-05
“…have taken into account, or took into account an immaterial factor, or that the exercise of his discretion was “wholly wrong” (see, e.g., Adamson v Halifax Plc [2002] EWCA Civ 1134; [2003] 1 WLR 60 at [16] per Sir Murray Stuart-Smith, adopting (post-CPR) the conventional (pre-CPR) approach he described in Roache v News Group Newspapers Li…”
Cited — Ashdown & Ors v Griffin & Ors 2018-07-30
“…Sir Murray Stuart-Smith said this about costs appeals in Adamson v Halifax plc [2002] EWCA Civ 1134, [2003] 1 WLR 60 (at paragraph 16):…”
Cited — Sirketi v Kupeli & Ors 2018-05-31
“…have taken into account, or took into account an immaterial factor, or that the exercise of his discretion was “wholly wrong” (see, e.g., Adamson v Halifax Plc [2002] EWCA Civ 1134; [2003] 1 WLR 60 at [16] per Sir Murray Stuart-Smith, adopting (post-CPR) the conventional (pre-CPR) approach he described in Roache v News Group Newspapers Li…”