How many times has [2003] EWCA Civ 402 been cited?

[2003] EWCA Civ 402 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWCA Civ 402

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] EWCA Civ 402

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Bishop & Anor v Transport for London 2019-04-05
“…e appellants had been awarded was “not insignificant”. Under the principles adopted in “money only” cases – for example, A.L. Barnes Ltd. v Time Talk (UK) Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 402, Day v Day and Straker v Tudor Rose [2007] EWCA Civ 368, [2007] C.P. Rep. 32 – and in line with the guidance in the Practice Directions, the appellants ought t…”
Cited — Sirketi v Kupeli & Ors 2018-05-31
“…That has been reflected in other money claims. For example, in A L Barnes Limited v Timetalk (UK) Limited [2003] EWCA Civ 402; [2003] BLR 331 at [38] (“A L Barnes”), a commercial dispute, Longmore LJ observed:…”